The NDA’s manifesto release in Bihar, which lasted less than a minute, was important symbolically but caused a lot of political controversy. The ceremony was meant to show unity and continuity under PM Modi and CM Nitish Kumar, but critics focused on how short it was, which took away from the message.
⚖️ Pros and Cons: Pros (Strategic Advantages)
Message of Togetherness:
The presence of five allies, who were compared to the “Pandavas,” made the coalition look more united, which was important for the NDA’s story of stability in a time of regional fragmentation.
Strategic value: Unity symbols may appeal to rural and traditional people who respect order and agreement among leaders.
Controlled Communication: The ceremony was short, which kept people from saying things that weren’t planned or contradicting each other, which is common in coalition contexts.
Data point: In 2019, more than 68% of political disputes in state elections were caused by comments that weren’t on the record (ADR data review, 2020).
Modi and Nitish Dual Trust Factor: Putting it as a “guarantee of Modi, trust of Nitish” combines the credibility of national leaders with the expertise of local leaders. This is a dual-anchor technique.
Voter behavior insight: Bihar’s 2020 election surveys found that 62% of respondents cared more about stable leadership than detailed policies (CSDS-Lokniti).
❌ Cons (Strategic Risks)
Feeling of Arrogance or Avoidance: The opposition’s narrative that Nitish wasn’t permitted to speak could turn off emotional people who care about “izzat” (respect) for Bihar’s leaders.
Effect: Could cause resentment based on identity, especially among Nitish’s main Kurmi and OBC voters.
Missed Policy Communication Opportunity: Manifestos are usually used to show a vision and engage with young people and city voters who want details. A ceremony that lasts only 26 seconds shows that the policy isn’t very deep.
According to the Lokniti-CSDS National Voter Study, 43% of first-time voters said that “clarity on promises” was important to their decision to vote in 2024.
Media optics: The shortness of the story made it simple for the other side’s stories to take over the news (for example, “Nitish silenced” was trending on social media).
| Metric | 2015 | 2020 | 2025 (Projected Trend) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voter Turnout | 56.7% | 57.1% | ~58% (expected rise due to youth voters) |
| Youth (18–29) Share | 27% | 31% | 34% |
| Top 3 Voter Concerns | Jobs, Education, Corruption | Jobs, Health, Migration | Employment, Price Rise, Governance Trust |
| Nitish’s Approval (CSDS) | 72% (2015) | 45% (2020) | 50–55% (2025 est.) |
In the short term, gaining control over the message may mean losing control over the story in the long term.
🌍 Public Impact Analysis
🟢 Possible Benefits for the Public Coalition Stability:
Gives investors, bureaucrats, and the public more faith that governance will stay stable with an established leadership formula.
K.C. Tyagi’s assurance that there will be “no compromise on communal harmony” helps reassure minorities and moderate voters as the country becomes more divided. Possible Public Drawbacks
Transparency Deficit: Because there hasn’t been much talk about the manifesto, people don’t know much about NDA’s development roadmap, especially when it comes to jobs, migration, and education.
Less Accountability: It’s harder for the public to judge how well someone did after the election if they don’t have clear pledges. Context Based on Data (Bihar Political Landscape)
The three most important things to votersCorruption, Jobs, and EducationWork, health, and movingEmployment, Price Rise, Trust in Government, and Nitish’s Approval (CSDS) 72% in 2015 and 45% in 202050–55% (2025 est.)
Understanding: The NDA’s goal is not merely to bring people together in a symbolic way, but also to deal with economic dissatisfaction, especially among people aged 18 to 35.
Key Point
The NDA chose symbolic above substance, hoping that the need for thorough manifesto talks would be less important than the requirement for unity optics and Modi-Nitish trust branding.
But the public benefit is minimal unless there is targeted policy outreach after that. The risk is that people would think that being short is a sign of political defensiveness instead of confidence.
About the Author
